To zobaczmy jak to tam jest według owych uczonych, a nie serka.
TL;DR: Efekt jest mały, dotyczy specyficznej grupy wierzących z mocno zsekularyzowanych państw, którzy sami są dość liberalni. Badanie jest wstępne i autorzy dosłownie informuję, że generalizacja, jakieś dopuścił się serek jest na podstawie ich badania bezzasadna.
"The results further suggest that, at least in secularized Western countries, where unbelief has progressively become normative, nonbelievers may be less socialized and
less motivated to imagine, understand, and appreciate others' perspectives. (It cannot be excluded that results may differ in societies where mean religiosity is high and religionists do not often interact with the, few, non-believers).
[...]
Finally, the effects are clearly small in size. However, the results
seem to show some consistency: they applied to three different countries (UK, France, and Spain). Moreover, and importantly, they did not seem to be an artifact of sociodemographic variables (age, gender, education, and socioeconomic level) when comparisons were made in the total sample as well as across countries. Nevertheless, we consider our findings to be suggestive and the study exploratory. Before being generalized, these findings need replication and extension, also in terms of samples, measures, and alternative constructs.
First, in this study the Christian samples may not have been fully representative of a highly religious population. These samples scored overall moderately on religiosity and were particularly “liberal” or “questers”, judging from the high scores on symbolic unbelief (lower than non-believers, but still higher than the midpoint of the scale) and from the fact that liberal religious participants are typically overrepresented in online surveys[...]"
To zobaczmy jak to tam jest według owych uczonych, a nie serka. TL;DR: Efekt jest mały, dotyczy specyficznej grupy wierzących z mocno zsekularyzowanych państw, którzy sami są dość liberalni. Badanie jest wstępne i autorzy dosłownie informuję, że generalizacja, jakieś dopuścił się serek jest na podstawie ich badania bezzasadna. "The results further suggest that, at least in secularized Western countries, where unbelief has progressively become normative, nonbelievers may be less socialized and less motivated to imagine, understand, and appreciate others' perspectives. (It cannot be excluded that results may differ in societies where mean religiosity is high and religionists do not often interact with the, few, non-believers). [...] Finally, the effects are clearly small in size. However, the results seem to show some consistency: they applied to three different countries (UK, France, and Spain). Moreover, and importantly, they did not seem to be an artifact of sociodemographic variables (age, gender, education, and socioeconomic level) when comparisons were made in the total sample as well as across countries. Nevertheless, we consider our findings to be suggestive and the study exploratory. Before being generalized, these findings need replication and extension, also in terms of samples, measures, and alternative constructs. First, in this study the Christian samples may not have been fully representative of a highly religious population. These samples scored overall moderately on religiosity and were particularly “liberal” or “questers”, judging from the high scores on symbolic unbelief (lower than non-believers, but still higher than the midpoint of the scale) and from the fact that liberal religious participants are typically overrepresented in online surveys[...]"
OdpowiedzA Ty jesteś ateista czy wierzącym?
Odpowiedz@ceroy1210: Obawiam się, że to chyba było pytanie retoryczne.
Odpowiedz